Thanks for staying on top of this, Maria. It's so important that these continually shifting numbers are captured in real time, and that a permanent record is created. If and when we ever get a real Congress elected, this needs to be thoroughly investigated.
"Our dead friends are back." That's a shame. Maybe some of them could have helped us to figure out what in the world is going on with the big increases of excess COVID deaths of all cohorts in 2021, the two oldest excepted. And why did the skew of 2021 excess COVID deaths shift so much leftward toward the middle cohort, 40-54 (which happens to be mine), and 25-35 relative to 2020? 2020 is skewed well to the right. Is that an effect of mandates on employees who, because they're most likely to have dependents, are least likely to quit their jobs? This looks like a smoking gun, but I've been so neglectful about my knowledge of stats that I haven't any idea how to test the hypothesis that the leftward movement of the skew counts as evidence of vax-caused death.
Now, it came out in May or so of 2020 that the government was paying health care providers when they report deaths as COVID deaths. I wonder what's been going on with that program(s), and I have since learned that there are payments for funeral services, too. Steve Kirsch interviewed a retired undertaker a month or so ago. I checked out the website of the guy's former employer, and there it was.
I bring this up because the incentives are, or were, perverse enough to affect behavior, and thus the statistics reported by the very same institution responsible for the incentives. So....if the incentives changed materially, we should expect this to affect reported COVID deaths. Another question I have is about the effect of the incentives by age cohor. Why expect them to affect all age cohorts equally? And what other incentives (positive or negative), in addition to financial incentives and mandates, could affect reported COVID deaths?
We can certainly question whether all those supposed COVID deaths really were that, because it's getting harder to hide the bodies. They don't want to have high COVID deaths when they're pumping people full of "vaccines", but they also don't want to admit that folks are dropping dead of sudden heart attacks and strokes all over the place. Plus, as you pointed out, they don't get paid for those vax-induced deaths, so quick, pump a little COVID air into the morgue...
I didn't know you were writing on Substack, Maria Romana! I just subscribed and read your article...
I think this Covid Scamdemic +KillerJabs is the Biggest Fraud in the History of Mankind. It's not clear yet if the Final Solution of Fauci/Pfizer/Klaus Schwab/WEF/TheVatican is depopulation - getting rid of 90% of the human race in 2-3 years (especially getting rid of the people in the West: North America +Europe +AUS +NZ) - or DNA cataloguing and tracking - or 1984-style remote control +social credit score.
Or perhaps all 3.
From what I see, it is clear that the KillerJabs (whatever is in them) are racially targeted at the white race. There is no push to forced vaccination in Africa, nor in India. Why?
Hey Matt, I actually addressed the point of ODs in the middle of the article; while they may have contributed, their increase alone barely scratches the surface of the overall increase in deaths.
On the infections, it may well have been that infections were higher, and I would blame that on the vaccines, as well, however, I won't dispute that the vaccines seem to offer some protection against severe disease and death once you're infected. I wrote an article on that point back in January: https://mariaromana.substack.com/p/the-covid-vaccines-do-i-feel-lucky .
Actually haven't seen that one. Gotta run and take a look, but yes, the cause of this hike in mortality involves many, many variables, and thanks to our CDC preferring lots of smoke and mirrors around their work, we'll probably never be able to sort it all out.
And I agree with the age-based treatment. For folks over 70 or 75, the risk-benefit trade-off of the vaccines may work out in favor of the vax; particularly if the subject has not already had COVID and/or has significant co-morbidities. And yes, certainly no one under 30 or 40 needs this drug, and for the crew in between 40 and 70 (you and me), there's no clear indication at this point, whether the vax or the disease is more of a threat...unless we consider that early treatment with re-purposed drugs brings the disease risk very close to zero.
Thanks for staying on top of this, Maria. It's so important that these continually shifting numbers are captured in real time, and that a permanent record is created. If and when we ever get a real Congress elected, this needs to be thoroughly investigated.
Agreed! If we ever get a real Congress again, there's soooooo much that needs to be investigated!
I put Maria's substack in a list-essay I published recently on the seven Best Vax-Harm Substacks. Keep up the good work, Maria! https://pomocon.substack.com/p/the-best-vax-harm-substacks?s=w
Thank you, Carl Eric Scott! I'm flattered, and I'll keep reporting...just nowhere near as frequently as most of these folks!
"Our dead friends are back." That's a shame. Maybe some of them could have helped us to figure out what in the world is going on with the big increases of excess COVID deaths of all cohorts in 2021, the two oldest excepted. And why did the skew of 2021 excess COVID deaths shift so much leftward toward the middle cohort, 40-54 (which happens to be mine), and 25-35 relative to 2020? 2020 is skewed well to the right. Is that an effect of mandates on employees who, because they're most likely to have dependents, are least likely to quit their jobs? This looks like a smoking gun, but I've been so neglectful about my knowledge of stats that I haven't any idea how to test the hypothesis that the leftward movement of the skew counts as evidence of vax-caused death.
Now, it came out in May or so of 2020 that the government was paying health care providers when they report deaths as COVID deaths. I wonder what's been going on with that program(s), and I have since learned that there are payments for funeral services, too. Steve Kirsch interviewed a retired undertaker a month or so ago. I checked out the website of the guy's former employer, and there it was.
I bring this up because the incentives are, or were, perverse enough to affect behavior, and thus the statistics reported by the very same institution responsible for the incentives. So....if the incentives changed materially, we should expect this to affect reported COVID deaths. Another question I have is about the effect of the incentives by age cohor. Why expect them to affect all age cohorts equally? And what other incentives (positive or negative), in addition to financial incentives and mandates, could affect reported COVID deaths?
We can certainly question whether all those supposed COVID deaths really were that, because it's getting harder to hide the bodies. They don't want to have high COVID deaths when they're pumping people full of "vaccines", but they also don't want to admit that folks are dropping dead of sudden heart attacks and strokes all over the place. Plus, as you pointed out, they don't get paid for those vax-induced deaths, so quick, pump a little COVID air into the morgue...
I didn't know you were writing on Substack, Maria Romana! I just subscribed and read your article...
I think this Covid Scamdemic +KillerJabs is the Biggest Fraud in the History of Mankind. It's not clear yet if the Final Solution of Fauci/Pfizer/Klaus Schwab/WEF/TheVatican is depopulation - getting rid of 90% of the human race in 2-3 years (especially getting rid of the people in the West: North America +Europe +AUS +NZ) - or DNA cataloguing and tracking - or 1984-style remote control +social credit score.
Or perhaps all 3.
From what I see, it is clear that the KillerJabs (whatever is in them) are racially targeted at the white race. There is no push to forced vaccination in Africa, nor in India. Why?
(only 6% are "vaxxed" in Africa)
Hey Matt, I actually addressed the point of ODs in the middle of the article; while they may have contributed, their increase alone barely scratches the surface of the overall increase in deaths.
On the infections, it may well have been that infections were higher, and I would blame that on the vaccines, as well, however, I won't dispute that the vaccines seem to offer some protection against severe disease and death once you're infected. I wrote an article on that point back in January: https://mariaromana.substack.com/p/the-covid-vaccines-do-i-feel-lucky .
I appreciate your thoughtful commentary!
Actually haven't seen that one. Gotta run and take a look, but yes, the cause of this hike in mortality involves many, many variables, and thanks to our CDC preferring lots of smoke and mirrors around their work, we'll probably never be able to sort it all out.
And I agree with the age-based treatment. For folks over 70 or 75, the risk-benefit trade-off of the vaccines may work out in favor of the vax; particularly if the subject has not already had COVID and/or has significant co-morbidities. And yes, certainly no one under 30 or 40 needs this drug, and for the crew in between 40 and 70 (you and me), there's no clear indication at this point, whether the vax or the disease is more of a threat...unless we consider that early treatment with re-purposed drugs brings the disease risk very close to zero.